Daniel Siniakov vs Jiri Cizek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Jun at 01:06 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Siniakov vs J. Cizek

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Siniakov 1 - 0 Cizek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Siniakov winning 2 and Jiri Cizek winning 0. The last match between Daniel Siniakov and Jiri Cizek was at the M25 Ceska Lipa, 10-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Daniel Siniakov getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Siniakov | 1 |
Cizek | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Ceska Lipa(06-10-25)
D. Siniakov vs J. Cizek H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
56.28% (112-87) | Career Total W/L | 57.01% (61-46) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Siniakov vs J. Cizek Match Preview:
- Cizek's recent second serve performance sees them winning 45.54% of points, slightly surpassing Siniakov's 44%. Could this small advantage play a decisive role in their upcoming match?
- Analyzing return games, Siniakov leads with a 49.48% success rate against opponent second serves, compared to Cizek's 45.15%. This could hint at Siniakov's edge when returning.
- In first serve returns, Siniakov dominates with 35.46%, while Cizek trails with 25.69%. Does this suggest Siniakov's superior position when facing strong serves?
- Under pressure, Cizek excels in saving breakpoints at 62.37%, outpacing Siniakov's 51.72%. How might this resilience impact high-pressure moments?
- Over the past year, Cizek has won 64.91% of their matches. Siniakov is slightly better at 65.38%. Who maintains consistent performance despite these close win rates?
- Both players prefer hard courts, with Cizek winning 64% and Siniakov closely behind at 63%. Will the match surface favor one over the other?
- When facing tougher opponents, Cizek plays against a higher average rank of 150.51 compared to Siniakov's 212.46. Can this difference in competition level influence the outcome?
- In deciding sets, Cizek boasts an impressive 80% win rate, unlike Siniakov's 50%. Could this suggest an advantage in tight, late-match situations?
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Cizek's 35.56% success rate eclipses Siniakov's 22.58%. Who could capitalize more on critical opportunities during the match?
Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):
Examining the latest performance statistics, Cizek appears to have a marginal advantage in several critical areas.
Although Siniakov demonstrates superior return game stats, particularly on second serves, Cizek's strength in breakpoint conversion and their ability to hold under pressure can prove decisive.
Furthermore, Cizek's superior record in deciding sets indicates a potential edge in closely contested matches.
Considering these factors, Cizek is favored to secure victory in the upcoming tennis match.
Daniel Siniakov vs Jiri Cizek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Siniakov vs J. Cizek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 7 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:35:42 | Average Match Time | 1:35:42 |
78% (50/64) | 1st Serve % | 48% (29/60) |
66% (33/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (16/29) |
43% (6/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) |
50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (3/12) |
53% (32/60) | Return Points Win % | 39% (25/64) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Siniakov Recent Matches Played
J. Cizek Recent Matches Played

D. Siniakov vs J. Cizek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.28% (112/87) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.01% (61/46) |
55.63% (252/201) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.14% (127/112) |
53.57% (2278/1974) | Games Win/Loss | 51.18% (1232/1175) |
63.16% (12/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.42% (13/6) |
54.90% (84/69) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.65% (47/39) |
59.26% (16/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
213 | Aces Total | 116 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
617 | Total Double Faults | 125 |
1:7:30 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
323.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 177.57 |
68% (5977/8763) | 1st Serve % | 54% (1352/2483) |
63% (3791/5977) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (880/1352) |
42% (1179/2786) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (532/1131) |
45% (440/972) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (86/195) |
43% (3715/8689) | Return Points Win % | 37% (846/2272) |
17.65% (3/14) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
59.89% (109/73) | Futures W/L | 58.10% (61/44) |
56% (111/198) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (60/102) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
61% (22/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (10/20) |
48% (26/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 82% (23/28) |
84% (116/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (51/46) |
16% (116/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (51/5) |
17% (83/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (56/15) |